Answers and Solutions


    1. Yes, since \(4(1)=4\) and \(4 \lt 8\) is a true statement, \(x=1\) is a solution to \(4x \lt 8\).
    2. Yes, since \(-3(5) = -15\) and \(-15 \geq -15\) is a true statement, \(g=5\) is a solution to \(-3g \geq -15\).
    3. No, since \(-2+5=3\) and \(1 \gt 3\) is a false statement, \(z=5\) is not a solution to \(1 \gt -2 + z\).
    4. No, since \(-2(3) = -6\) and \(-6 \lt -6\) is a false statement, \(y=3\) is not a solution to \(-6 \lt -2y\).
    1. To solve, we add \(3\) to both sides of the inequality.

      \(\begin{align*} x-3 &\gt 8 \\ x - 3 \class{hl2}{+3} &\gt 8 \class{hl2}{+3} \\ x & \gt 11 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is greater than \(11\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(x\) that is smaller than \(11\), then the original inequality will be false.
      • choose \(11\) as the value for \(x\), then the original inequality will be false.
      • choose any value for \(x\) that is larger than \(11\), then the original inequality will be true.
    2. To solve, we subtract \(4\) from both sides of the inequality.

      \(\begin{align*} h + 4 &\geq 5 \\ h +4 \class{hl2}{-4} &\geq 5 \class{hl2}{-4} \\ h &\geq 1 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(h\) that is greater than or equal to \(1\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(h\) that is smaller than \(1\), then the original inequality will be false.
      • choose \(1\) as the value for \(h\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose any value for \(h\) that is larger than \(1\), then the original inequality will be true.
    3. To solve, we multiply both sides of the inequality by \(4\).

      \(\begin{align*} \frac{t}{4} &\leq 2 \\ \frac{t}{4} \class{hl2}{(4)} &\leq 2 \class{hl2}{(4)} \\ t & \leq 8 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(t\) that is less than or equal to \(8\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(t\) that is smaller than \(8\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose \(8\) as the value for \(t\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose any value for \(t\) that is larger than \(8\), then the original inequality will be false.
    4. To solve, we divide both sides of the inequality by \(-7\). Since we are dividing by a negative value, we must remember to reverse \(\gt\) to \(\lt\).

      \(\begin{align*} -7x &\gt 14 \\ \frac{-7x}{\class{hl2}{-7}} & \class{bg6}{\lt \;} \frac{14}{\class{hl2}{-7}} \\ x &\lt -2 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is less than \(-2\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(x\) that is smaller than \(-2\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose \(-2\) as the value for \(x\), then the original inequality will be false.
      • choose any value for \(x\) that is larger than \(-2\), then the original inequality will be false.
    5. First, we collect like terms.

      \(\begin{align*} 5x - 2x &\lt -24 \\ 3x & \lt -24 \end{align*}\)

      To solve, we divide both sides of the inequality by \(3\).

      \(\begin{align*} 3x & \lt -24 \\ \frac{3x}{\class{hl2}{3}} &\lt \frac{-24}{\class{hl2}{3}} \\ x &\lt -8 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is less than \(-8\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(x\) that is smaller than \(-8\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose \(-8\) as the value for \(x\), then the original inequality will be false.
      • choose any value for \(x\) that is larger than \(-8\), then the original inequality will be false.
    6. First, we collect like terms.

      \(\begin{align*} \frac{y}{3} - \frac{y}{4} &\leq 1 + \frac{1}{2} \\[1mm] \frac{4y}{12} - \frac{3y}{12} &\leq \frac{2}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \\[1mm] \frac{y}{12} &\leq \frac{3}{2} \end{align*}\)

      To solve, we multiply both sides of the inequality by \(12\).

      \(\begin{align*} \frac{y}{12} &\leq \frac{3}{2} \\[1mm] \frac{y}{12} \class{hl2}{(12)} &\leq \frac{3}{2} \class{hl2}{(12)} \\[1mm] y &\leq \frac{36}{2} \\[1mm] y &\leq 18 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(y\) that is less than or equal to \(18\), the original inequality will be true.

      Verifying: Convince yourself that if you were to:

      • choose any value for \(y\) that is smaller than \(18\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose \(18\) as the value for \(y\), then the original inequality will be true.
      • choose any value for \(y\) that is larger than \(18\), then the original inequality will be false.
    1. To solve the inequality we divide both sides by \(2\).

      \(\begin{align*} 2x &\gt 17 \\ \frac{2x}{\class{hl2}{2}} &\gt \frac{17}{\class{hl2}{2}} \\ x &\gt 8.5 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is greater than \(8.5\), the original inequality will be true. The smallest integer greater than \(8.5\) is \(9\). Therefore, \(9\) is the smallest integer value that satisfies the inequality \(2x \gt 17\).
    2. To solve the inequality we add \(11\) to both sides.

      \(\begin{align*} x - 11 \class{hl2}{+11} &\geq \frac{3}{2} \class{hl2}{+11} \\ x &\geq 1.5 + 11 \\ x &\geq 12.5 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is greater than \(12.5\), the original inequality will be true. The smallest integer greater than \(12.5\) is \(13\). Therefore, \(13\) is the smallest integer value that satisfies the inequality \(x-11 \geq \frac{3}{2}\).
    1. To solve the inequality we subtract \(4\) from both sides.

      \(\begin{align*} x + 4 &\leq 21.5 \\ x+4 \class{hl2}{-4} & \leq 21.5 \class{hl2}{-4} \\ x &\leq 17.5 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is less than \(17.5\), the original inequality will be true. The greatest integer less than \(17.5\) is \(17\). Therefore, \(17\) is the greatest integer value that satisfies the inequality \(x+4 \leq 21.5\).
    2. To solve the inequality we divde both sides by \(5\).

      \(\begin{align*} 5x &\lt -9 \\ \frac{5x}{\class{hl2}{5}} &\lt \frac{-9}{\class{hl2}{5}} \\ x &\lt -1.8 \end{align*}\)

      This means if we choose any value for \(x\) that is less than \(-1.8\), the original inequality will be true. The greatest integer less than \(-1.8\) is \(-2\). Therefore, \(-2\) is the greatest integer value that satisfies the inequality \(5x \lt -9\).
    1. Let \(P\) represent the perimeter of the rectangle. Then, we have

      \(\begin{align*} P &= 2w + w + 2w + w \\ &= 6w \end{align*}\)

    2. If the perimeter of the rectangle is \(102\) cm, then we substitute \(P=102\) into the above equation and solve for \(w\) to find the width.

      \(\begin{align*} P &= 6w \\ 102 &= 6w \\ \frac{102}{\class{hl2}{6}} &= \frac{6w}{\class{hl2}{6}} \\ 17 &= w \end{align*}\)

      Therefore, if the perimeter is \(102\) cm then the width of the rectangle is \(17\) cm.
    3. If the perimeter of the rectangle is less than \(140\) cm, then we write \(P \lt 140\) which is equivalent to \(6w \lt 140\). Solving the inequality, we have

      \(\begin{align*} 6w &\lt 140 \\ \frac{6w}{\class{hl2}{6}} &\lt \frac{140}{\class{hl2}{6}} \\ w &\lt 23 \frac{1}{3} \end{align*}\)

      Therefore, if the perimeter of the rectangle is less than \(140\) cm then the width can be any value that is less than \(23 \frac{1}{3}\). But, the width is a measurement and so it should also be greater than \(0\).
    1. If \(V\) is greater than or equal to \(100\) then we write \(V \geq 100\). Since \(V=7n\) it follows that \(7n \geq 100\). Solving this inequality, we have

      \(\begin{align*} 7n &\geq 100 \\ \frac{7n}{\class{hl2}{7}} &\geq \frac{100}{\class{hl2}{7}} \\ n &\geq 14 \frac{2}{7} \end{align*}\)

      Since \(n\) represents the term number, \(n\) is an integer. Therefore, \(n=15\) is the smallest value for \(n\) such that \(V\) is greater than or equal to \(100\). 
    2. If \(V\) is a 3-digit integer then \(V\) is greater than or equal to \(100\) and less than \(1000\). From part (a) we know that \(n=15\) is the smallest value for \(n\) such that \(V\) is greater than or equal to \(100\). We are left to find the largest value for \(n\) such that \(V\) is less than \(1000\).

      \(\begin{align*} V &\lt 1000 \\ 7n &\lt 1000 \\[1mm] \frac{7n}{\class{hl2}{7}} &\lt \frac{1000}{\class{hl2}{7}} \\ n &\lt 142 \frac{6}{7} \end{align*}\)

      Since \(n\) is an integer, \(n=142\) is the largest value for \(n\) such that \(V\) is less than \(1000\).
      Therefore, \(V\) is a 3-digit integer when \(n=15, 16, 17, \ldots, 142\).
      Therefore, \(V\) is a 3-digit integer for \(128\) values of \(n\).
    1. \(E = 14.65h\)
    2. Substituting \(E = 14.65h\) into the inequality and solving, we have

      \(\begin{align*} E &\gt 1573.43 \\ 14.65h &\gt 1573.43 \\ \frac{14.65h}{\class{hl2}{14.65}} &\gt \frac{1573.43}{\class{hl2}{14.65}} \\ h &\gt 107.402 \end{align*}\)

      If we assume that Frederick only gets paid for every full hour of work, then \(h=108\) is the smallest number of hours he can work so that he has enough money to buy the computer.
      In this case, he would have earned \(108 \times $14.65 = $1582.20\).
    3. Based on Frederick's estimate, we must solve the inequality \(8.75h \gt 1573.43\).

      \(\begin{align*} E &\gt 1573.43 \\ 8.75h &\gt 1573.43 \\ \frac{8.75h}{\class{hl2}{8.75}} &\gt \frac{1573.43}{\class{hl2}{8.75}} \\ h &\gt 179.821 \end{align*}\)

      Again, assuming that Frederick only gets paid for every full hour of work, then \(h=180\) is the smallest number of hours he can work so that he can save enough money to buy the computer.
      In this case, he would have saved \(180 \times $8.75 = $1575\).
    1. \(s+2 \geq t+2\)
    2. \(a-6 \lt b-6\)
    3. \(3g \gt 3h\)
    4. \(-5p \geq -5q\)
    1. Answers will vary. 
      Since \(k \gt 3\) it follows that \(k+5 \gt 3+5\).
      Therefore, the inequality \(k+5 \gt 8\) has the solution \(k \gt 3\).
    2. Answers will vary. 
      Since \(k \gt 3\) it follows that \(k(10) \gt 3(10)\).
      Therefore, the inequality \(10k \gt 30\) has the solution \(k \gt 3\).
  1. No, it is not always true. For example, let \(a=2\), \(b=5\), \(c = -10\) and \(d=-5\).
    Then \(a-c = 2-(-10) = 12\) and \(b-d = 5 - (-5) = 10\).
    It follows that \(a-c \lt b-d\) is \(12 \lt 10\) which is a false statement.