Alternative Format — Lesson 1: Similarity and Congruence

Let's Start Thinking

Making Use of Similarity and Congruence

Engineers often build a scaled-down model of something before constructing a full-size version. This allows them to determine many properties of the final product by studying the miniature version. For example, they could work out how much steel would be needed to construct the hull of a ship or how much space would be available in the cargo bay of an airplane.

A scale model of an airplane.

A real airplane on the tarmac.

The miniature model and the full-size version are what we refer to in mathematics as similar.

Similarity and congruence are useful concepts with real-world applications. In this lesson, we will explore the notion of similarity, as well as congruence, which is a special case of similarity.


Lesson Goals

  • Define congruence and similarity.
  • Calculate the scale factor relating two similar polygons.
  • Determine the perimeter and area of a polygon using similarity.

Try This

A miniature model of a city has \(3\) square metres of green space. If a length of \(1\) metre on the model corresponds to a length of \(1000\) metres in the real world, then how much green space does the city have?

Miniature town made out of blocks.


Congruence

Definition of Congruence

Let's begin by reviewing the concept of congruence. In the tessellation shown, observe that any two tiles have the same size and shape. In other words, they are identical.

Tessellation of hexagons with two hexagons highlighted.

In math, we have a special name for this. We would say that these polygons are congruent to one another.

Two polygons are said to be congruent if they have the same shape and the same size.

Example 1

Determine whether the following two triangles are congruent.

Two triangles: JKL and MNO.

Solution

Examining these triangles, they appear to be the same shape and size. But how can we be sure?

We can rotate \(\triangle MNO\).

Triangle MNO is rotated such that both triangles are now oriented in the same way.

 We can superimpose \(\triangle MNO\) over \(\triangle JKL\). 

Triangle MNO is overlaid on triangle JKL showing that they are the same size and shape.

We can now see that these two triangles are, in fact, identical. Therefore, \(\triangle JKL\) and \(\triangle NMO\) are congruent since they are the same shape and size.

Example 2

Determine whether the following two polygons are congruent.

 Quadrilaterals PQRS and TUVW.

Solution

To the eye, these two quadrilaterals look like they might be the same size and shape. To check, we rotate \(TUVW\).

 Quadrilateral PQRS is rotated such that both quadrilaterals are now oriented in the same way.

Superimpose it over \(PQRS\).

When overlaid, quadrilateral TUVW is not the same shape as quadrilateral PQRS.

Notice that these two quadrilaterals are actually slightly different in shape. Therefore, quadrilaterals \(PQRS\) and \(TUVW\) are not congruent because they are different in shape.


Check Your Understanding 1

Question — Version 1

Are the following two polygons congruent? 

Two pentagons: A and B. A is larger than B.

Answer — Version 1

Not congruent

Feedback— Version 1

The two pentagons are not the same size and shape, so they are not congruent.

Question — Version 2

Are the following two polygons congruent? 

Two triangles: A and B. They appear to be the same size, and B is rotated with respect to A.

Answer — Version 2

Congruent

Feedback— Version 2

The two triangles are the same size and shape, so they are congruent.

Question — Version 3

Are the following two polygons congruent? 

Two quadrilaterals: A and B. B appears to have some side lengths in common with A, and some different than A.

Answer — Version 3

Not congruent

Feedback— Version 3

The two quadrilaterals are not the same size and shape, so they are not congruent.

Interactive Version

https://ggbm.at/nukj4um5


Example 3

Consider the following two triangles.

Determine if these triangles are congruent.

Solution

Option 1: By rotating \(\triangle DEF\) and overlaying on top of \(\triangle ABC\), we can show that these triangles are congruent.

Option 2: As an alternate means of demonstrating that these two triangles are congruent, observe that they have the same side lengths and same angles with the same relative positions.

Corresponding Sides

\( \begin{align*} AB &= DE =\text{ 4 cm} \\ BC &= EF = \text{ 6 cm}\\ AC &= DF = \text{ 8 cm} \end{align*}\)

Corresponding Angles

\( \begin{align*} \angle A &= \angle D = 47^{\circ}\\ \angle B &= \angle E = 104^{\circ}\\ \angle C &= \angle F = 29^{\circ} \end{align*}\)

Two polygons are congruent if

  • all corresponding sides are equal and
  • all corresponding angles are equal.

To denote that two polygons are congruent, we use the symbol \( \cong\).

For example, we can write \(\triangle ABC\) is congruent to \(\triangle DEF\) by writing \( \triangle \mathrm{ABC} \cong \triangle \mathrm{DEF}\).

 Note: The vertices in one polygon must be listed in the same order as the corresponding vertices in the congruent polygon.


Similarity

Definition of Similarity

Take a look at this tessellation pattern. Instead of comparing two single tiles as we did before, let's compare a single tile to a cluster of tiles.

A small diamond highlighted and a larger diamond highlighted (scaled up by a factor of 2).

Two polygons are said to be similar if they have the same shape.

Congruence is a special case of similarity. Any two congruent polygons by definition will have the same shape. They just also happen to be the same size.

Explore This 1

Question

What do you notice about the relationship between the side lengths of \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle DEF\)?

Description

To begin with, we have two congruent triangles, \(\triangle ABC\) and \(\triangle DEF\):

We may move point \(F\) such that the side lengths of \(\triangle DEF\) change, but its interior angles remain unchanged. If we arbitrarily move \(F\) such that \(DF\) is increased by a factor of \(1.5\), we have the following:

Triangle DEF has been enlarged

\[\begin{align*} DE&=1.5\cdot AB\\ DF&=1.5\cdot AC\\ EF&=1.5\cdot BC \end{align*}\]

If we arbitrarily move \(F\) such that \(DF\) is decreased by a factor of \(0.5\), we have the following:

Triangle DEF has been reduced in size.

\[\begin{align*} DE&=0.5\cdot AB\\ DF&=0.5\cdot AC\\ EF&=0.5\cdot BC \end{align*}\]

Created with GeoGebra. Author: University of Waterloo. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Interactive Version

https://ggbm.at/crtnmwch

Explore This 1 Summary

Triangle ABC.

Triangle DEF.

While moving around the point, you should have observed the following:

  1. The triangles are kept similar (i.e., corresponding angles remain equal):\[ \angle A = \angle D, \quad \angle B = \angle E, \quad \angle C = \angle F\]
  2. The side lengths of \(\triangle DEF\) are equal to the side lengths of \(\triangle ABC\) all multiplied by the same factor. We call this factor the scale factor.
    \[ DE = s \, AB, \quad EF = s \, BC, \quad DF = s \, AC, \quad s=\text{scale factor}\]

These observations lead to the following important fact about similar polygons:

Two polygons are similar when

  • all corresponding angles are equal and
  • all corresponding sides are proportional.

The symbol \(\sim\) (called a "tilde") is used to denote that two polygons are similar.

If \(\triangle ABC\) is similar to \(\triangle DEF\), we could write \( \triangle ABC \sim \triangle DEF\).

Example 4

The following two parallelograms are similar. Find the scale factor of \(JKLM\) to \(WXYZ\).

The first parallelogram, JKLM, has side lengths 4 and 6 and the second parallelogram, WXYZ, has side lengths 6 and 9.

Solution

Let \(s\) represent the scale factor. To find the value of \(s\), we first locate two corresponding sides. In this case, we can use the shorter sides on each parallelogram.

On the same parallelograms an arrow labelled 'times s' points from JM to corresponding side WZ

Now, since the parallelograms are similar, the value of \(s\) must satisfy the equation \(4 \times s=6\).

\[\begin{align*} 4\times s&=6\\ s&=\dfrac{3}{2} \end{align*}\]

The scale factor of \(JKLM\) to \(WXYZ\) is \(\dfrac{3}{2}\).

We can check that the scale factor works with the other pairs of corresponding sides as well. That is, we can confirm that \(6\) times \(\dfrac{3}{2}\) is equal to \(9\).

It is worth mentioning that we could have used this pair of corresponding sides to find the scale factor instead. We just happened to choose a different pair of sides to work with.

Example 5

The following two trapezoids are similar. What is the scale factor of \(WXYZ\) to \(QRST\)?

Trapezoid WXYZ. WX=20, XY=20, YZ=32, WZ=16. Trapezoid QRST. QR=5, RS=5, ST=8, QT=4.

Solution

We are told that the trapezoids are similar, but in order to determine a scale factor, we must first find a pair of corresponding sides. In this problem, we can do this by reasoning that the longest sides in both trapezoids must be corresponding. Here, this means that sides \(ZY\)and \(TS\) are corresponding.

 On the same parallelograms an arrow pointing from one side of WXYZ to the corresponding side on QRST

The scale factor from \(WXYZ\) to \(QRST\) can then be determined by noticing that the length of \(TS\) is \(\dfrac{1}{4}\) that of \(ZY\). In other words, \(32\) times \(\dfrac{1}{4}\) is \(8\). Therefore, the scale factor of \(WXYZ\) to \(QRST\) is \(\dfrac{1}{4}\).

On the same parallelograms an arrow labelled 'times one quarter' points for YZ to corresponding side ST

\[TS = \frac{1}{4} ZY\]

Therefore, the scale factor of \(WXYZ\) to \(QRST\) is \(\dfrac{1}{4}\).

This example reminds us that when we are finding the scale factor from one polygon to another, we should ask ourselves if we are comparing a smaller polygon to a larger polygon, or a larger polygon to a smaller polygon. If we are taking a smaller polygon and making it larger, then the scale factor will be greater than \(1\). On the other hand, if we start with a larger polygon and make it smaller, then our scale factor will be less than \(1\).

Check Your Understanding 2

Question — Version 1

Rectangle \(ABCD\) has a height of \(5\) and a width of \(7\). Can you draw a rectangle \(EFGH\), similar to \(ABCD\) with a scale factor of \(3\)?

A grid with rectangle ABCD of side lengths 5 and 7

Answer — Version 1

A grid with rectangle ABCD of side lengths 5 and 7, and rectangle EFGH with side lengths 15 and 21, respectively.

Feedback — Version 1

The scale factor is \(3\), so the new height will be \(3\times 5=15\) and the new width will be \(3\times 7 =21\).

Question — Version 2

Rectangle \(ABCD\) has a height of \(10\) and a width of \(20\). Can you draw a rectangle \(EFGH\), similar to \(ABCD\) with a scale factor of \(\dfrac{1}{5}\)?

A grid with rectangle ABCD of side lengths 10 and 20

Answer — Version 2

A grid with rectangle ABCD of side lengths 10 and 20, and rectangle EFGH with side lengths 2 and 4, respectively.

Feedback — Version 2

The scale factor is \(\dfrac{1}{5}\), so the new height will be \(10\times\dfrac{1}{5}=2\) and the new width will be \(20\times\dfrac{1}{5}=4\).

Created with GeoGebra. Author: University of Waterloo. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Interactive Version

https://ggbm.at/fxunmp7b


Once we know the scale factor relating two similar polygons, we can use information about one polygon to determine properties of the other.

Example 6

The trapezoids \(ABCD\) and \(EFGH\) are similar. Determine the length of \(GH\).

Small triangle: AD=BC=2, AB=3, CD=5. Big triangle: EH=FG=6, EF=9/

Solution

Step 1: Find the scale factor.

We first determine the scale factor from \(ABCD\) to \(EFGH\). To do so, we must isolate a pair of corresponding sides whose lengths are known. Since the sides \(AD\) and \(BC\) are equal in length, they must correspond to the sides \(EH\) and \(FG\). Let's use the corresponding sides \(AD\) and \(EH\) to solve for the scale factor which we'll denote \(s\).

\[ \begin{align*} EH &= s \, AD \\ s &= \frac{EH}{AD} \\ s&= \frac{6}{2} \\ s&= 3 \end{align*}\]

Step 2: Calculate the length of \(GH\).

Now that we know the scale factor, we can also conclude that sides \(AB\) and \(EF\) are corresponding. This means \(GH\) must correspond to \(CD\). Since we know that \(CD = 5\), we can solve for \(GH\).

\[\begin{align*} GH &= s \cdot CD \\ GH&= 3 \cdot 5 \\ GH&= 15 \end{align*}\]

Therefore, the length of \(GH\) is \(15\) units.


Check Your Understanding 3

Question

\(\triangle ABC\) is similar to \(\triangle PQR\). What is the length of \(PQ\) in \(\triangle PQR\) ?

Two similar triangles ABC and PQR. Triangle ABC has side lengths: AB=3.3, BC=7.4, AC=5.1. Triangle PQR has side lengths QR=16.2 and PR=11.3 given. Side PQ is unknown.

Answer

Side \(PQ\) is \(7.3\) units

Feedback

Step 1: Find the scale factor.

We first determine the scale factor from \(\triangle ABC\) to \(\triangle PQR\). To do so, we must isolate a pair of corresponding sides whose lengths are known. Since side \(PR\) corresponds to side \(AC\), we can use them to solve for the scale factor which we'll denote \(s\).

\[\begin{align*} PR &= s\cdot AC\\ s &= \dfrac{PR}{AC}\\ s &= \dfrac{11.3}{5.1}\\ s &= 2.2 \end{align*}\]

Step 2: Calculate the length of \(PQ\).

Now that we know the scale factor, we can also conclude that sides \(AB\) and \(PQ\) are corresponding. Since we know that \(AB=3.3\), we can solve for \(PQ\).

\[\begin{align*} PQ &= s\cdot AB\\ &= 2.2 \cdot 3.3\\ &\approx 7.3 \end{align*}\]

Therefore, the length of \(PQ\) is approximately \(7.3\) units.


Perimeter and Area of Similar Polygons

Perimeter of Similar Polygons

Given a pair of similar polygons, how are their perimeters related? To help answer this question, consider the similar triangles \(ABC\) and \(DEF\).

Triangle AB=2, BC=4, AC=5.

Triangle DEF: DE=4, EF=8, DF=10.

By inspection, we see that \(\triangle DEF\) is an enlargement of \(\triangle ABC\) with a scale factor of \(2\). The perimeter of each triangle is given by the sum of the side lengths For \(\triangle ABC\), summing the side lengths directly gives a perimeter of \(11\).

\[ \begin{align*} P_{\triangle ABC} &= AB + BC + AC \\ &= 2 + 4 + 5 \\ &= 11 \end{align*}\]

For \(\triangle DEF\), rather than adding the side lengths directly, notice that we can relate each side length to the corresponding side length in \(\triangle ABC\). The multiplicative factors are all the same, \(2\), and can be factored out to give an expression in terms of the perimeter of \(\triangle ABC\).

\[ \begin{align*} P_{\triangle DEF} &= DE + EF + DF \\ &= 2( AB) +2 (BC) +2(AC) \\ &= 2 \left(AB + BC + AC\right)\\ &= 2\left(P_{\triangle ABC}\right)\\ &=2(11)\\ &=22 \end{align*}\]

In doing so, we see that the perimeter of \(\triangle DEF\) is equal to the perimeter of \(\triangle ABC\) multiplied by the scale factor relating the two similar triangles. In fact, this result holds true for any pair of similar polygons.

The perimeter of a polygon is equal to the perimeter of a similar polygon multiplied by the scale factor relating the two polygons.

Check Your Understanding 4

Question — Version 1

Quadrilateral \(ABCD\) is similar to quadrilateral \(EFGH\). Quadrilateral \(ABCD\) has a perimeter of \(75\) units. Given the side lengths in the diagram, what is the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) ?

Two similar quadrilaterals ABCD and EFGH. AB corresponds to EF, AB=15, and EF=10.

Answer — Version 1

Perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) is \(50\) units.

Feedback — Version 1

Step 1: Calculate the scale factor

Since the quadrilaterals are similar, the corresponding sides \(AB\) and \(EF\) can be used to determine the scale factor.

\[\begin{align*} EF &= s \cdot AB\\ s &= \dfrac{EF}{AB}\\ &=\dfrac{10}{15}\\ &=\dfrac{2}{3} \end{align*}\]

Step 2: Use the scale factor to determine the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\).

\[\begin{align*} P_{EFGH} &= s \cdot P_{ABCD}\\ &=\dfrac{2}{3}\cdot 75\\ &=50 \end{align*}\]

Therefore, the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) is \(50\) units.

Question — Version 2

Quadrilateral \(ABCD\) is similar to quadrilateral \(EFGH\). Quadrilateral \(ABCD\) has a perimeter of \(32\) units. Given the side lengths in the diagram, what is the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) ?

Two similar quadrilaterals ABCD and EFGH. AB corresponds to EF, AB=2, and EF=4.

Answer — Version 2

Perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) is \(64\) units.

Feedback — Version 2

Step 1: Calculate the scale factor

Since the quadrilaterals are similar, the corresponding sides \(AB\) and \(EF\) can be used to determine the scale factor.

\[\begin{align*} EF &= s \cdot AB\\ s &= \dfrac{EF}{AB}\\ &=\dfrac{4}{2}\\ &=2 \end{align*}\]

Step 2: Use the scale factor to determine the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\).

\[\begin{align*} P_{EFGH} &= s \cdot P_{ABCD}\\ &=2\cdot 32\\ &=64 \end{align*}\]

Therefore, the perimeter of quadrilateral \(EFGH\) is \(64\) units.

Explore This 2

Question

As the scale factor changes, what do you notice about the relationship between the areas of the similar figures?

Description

Triangles

How are the areas of these similar triangles related?

A smaller triangle is shown inside a larger triangle that is scaled up by a factor of 2 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(2\)

The area of the larger triangle is \(4\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller triangle is shown inside a larger triangle that is scaled up by a factor of 3 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(3\)

The area of the larger triangle is \(9\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller triangle is shown inside a larger triangle that is scaled up by a factor of 4 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(4\)

The area of the larger triangle is \(16\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

Parallelograms

How are the areas of these similar parallelograms related?

A smaller parallelogram is shown inside a larger parallelogram that is scaled up by a factor of 2 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(2\)

The area of the larger parallelogram is \(4\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller parallelogram is shown inside a larger parallelogram that is scaled up by a factor of 3 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(3\)

The area of the larger parallelogram is \(9\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller parallelogram is shown inside a larger parallelogram that is scaled up by a factor of 4 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(4\)

The area of the larger parallelogram is \(16\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

Trapezoids

How are the areas of these similar trapezoids related?

A smaller trapezoid is shown inside a larger trapezoid that is scaled up by a factor of 2 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(2\)

The area of the larger trapezoid is \(4\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller trapezoid is shown inside a larger trapezoid that is scaled up by a factor of 3 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(3\)

The area of the larger trapezoid is \(9\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

A smaller trapezoid is shown inside a larger trapezoid that is scaled up by a factor of 4 in both width and height.

Scale factor: \(4\)

The area of the larger trapezoid is \(16\) times the area of the smaller triangle.

Interactive Version

https://ggbm.at/zf4mrj54

Explore This 2 Summary

You may have observed that the area of a triangle, parallelogram, or trapezoid is always equal to the area of a similar polygon multiplied by two factors of the relevant scale factor. This makes sense because for each of these polygons, the area involves a product of two lengths.

For example, the area of a parallelogram is equal to its base length multiplied by its height. Consider the area of a parallelogram with a scale factor of \(4\):

\[A_{\text{Parallelogram}} = bh\]

Parallelogram ABCD with side lengths of 1.

Parallelogram EFGH with side lengths 4.

Since the base and height each scale by one factor of the scale factor, the area scales by the square of the scale factor:

\[A_{EFGH}= \left(A_{ABCD}\right)\left(4^2\right) = \left(A_{ABCD}\right)(16)\]

Area of Similar Polygons

Let's explore this result in a bit more detail with a simple but concrete example. Consider two similar rectangles \(ABCD\) and \(EFGH\).

Rectangle ABCD with AB = CD = 3, BC = AD = 2.

Rectangle EFGH  with EF = GH = 6, EH = FG = 4.

Notice rectangle \(ABCD\) has an area of \(6\),

\[ \begin{align*} A_{ABCD} &= (AB) ( BC) \\ &= 3 ( 2) \\ &= 6 \end{align*}\]

and rectangle \(EFGH\) has an area of \(24\).

\[ \begin{align*} A_{EFGH} &= (EF) ( FG) \\ &= 6 ( 4) \\ &= 24 \end{align*}\]

How are the areas of the similar rectangles related?

The area of a polygon always involves a product of two lengths, in this case, the base times the height. 

Therefore, when re-scaling a polygon to create a similar polygon, each length scales by a factor of the scale factor. 

This means that their product, the area, will scale by two factors, or the square of the scale factor.

Our example confirms this statement. By inspection, we see that rectangle \(EFGH\) is similar to rectangle \(ABCD\) with a scale factor of \(2\). 

Rectangle ABCD with AB = CD = 3, BC = AD = 2.

\(A_{ABCD}=6\)

Rectangle EFGH  with EF = GH = 6, EH = FG = 4.

\(A_{EFGH}=24\)

Multiplying the area of rectangle \(ABCD\), \(6\), by the square of the scale factor, \(4\), yields the area of rectangle \(EFGH\), \(24\).

\( A_{EFGH} \)

\(=\left(A_{ABCD}\right)\left(2^2\right)\)

 

\(= 6(4)\)

 

\(=24\)

This result holds for any pair of similar polygons. The area of any polygon is equal to the area of a similar polygon multiplied by the square of the scale factor relating the two polygons.

Let's return now to the problem at the beginning of this lesson.

Try This Revisited

A miniature model of a city has \(3\) square metres of green space. If a length of \(1\) metre on the model corresponds to a length of \(1000\) metres in the real world, then how much green space does the city have?

Miniature town made out of blocks.

Solution

The miniature model of the city has the same shape as the city itself. In other words, the miniature model is similar to the actual city. The total area of green space in the real world will therefore be equal to the amount in the model times the square of the relevant scale factor.

\[ A_{\text{Green Space in City}} = \left(A_{\text{Green Space in Model}}\right)\left(s^2\right)\]

We know that \(1\) metre on the model corresponds to \(1000\) metres in the real world. Therefore, the scale factor we need is \(s=1000\).

The total area of green space in the city is therefore equal to the following expression:

\[\begin{align*} A_{\text{Green Space in City}} &= (3) \left(1000^2\right)\\ &= 3~000~000 \end{align*}\]

This is equivalent to \(3\) square kilometres.

Check Your Understanding 5

Question

In the image below, \(\triangle ABC \sim \triangle DEF\). The area of \(\triangle ABC\) is \(81\) square units. Determine the area of \(\triangle DEF\) using the information given.

  • \(AB=9\)
  • \(DE=6\)

Two similar triangles ABC and DEF. AB corresponds to DE.

Answer

The area of \(\triangle DEF\) is \(36\) square units.

Feedback

Since the triangles are similar, the corresponding sides \(AB\) and \(DE\) can be used to determine the scale factor.

\[\begin{align*} s &= \dfrac{DE}{AB}\\ &=\dfrac{6}{9}\\ &=\dfrac{2}{3} \end{align*}\]

We can now use the scale factor to setermine the area of \(\triangle DEF\).

\[\begin{align*} A_{\triangle DEF} &= s^2\cdot A_{\triangle ABC}\\ &= \left(\dfrac{2}{3}\right)^2\cdot 81\\ &= \dfrac{4}{9}\cdot 81\\ &=36 \end{align*}\]

Therefore, the area of \(\triangle DEF\) is \(36\) square units.


Wrap-Up


Lesson Summary

In this lesson, we learned the following:

  • When two polygons have equal corresponding angles, they are similar. When the corresponding side lengths are also equal, they are congruent.
  • The corresponding side lengths of two similar polygons are all related by the same scale factor.
  • The perimeter of a polygon is equal to the perimeter of a similar polygon multiplied by the scale factor. The area of a polygon is equal to the area of a similar polygon multiplied by the square of the scale factor.

Take It With You

Rachael, who is \(1.7\) metres tall, is standing \(9\) metres from the base of a tree.

She notices that the top of her shadow matches up with the top of the shadow of the tree \(1\) metre away.

Can you find the height of the tree?

A person standing 1.7 metres tall is 9 metres from a tree. The sun casts their shadows meeting 1 metre from the person.